BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//International Cost Estimating and Analysis Association - ECPv6.2.2//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.iceaaonline.com
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for International Cost Estimating and Analysis Association
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20200308T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20201101T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20200603T120000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20200603T130000
DTSTAMP:20260502T140505
CREATED:20200506T154807Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200603T121800Z
UID:13842-1591185600-1591189200@www.iceaaonline.com
SUMMARY:Processes & Best Practices Category Winner Presentation
DESCRIPTION:Each webinar attended earns 0.1 points towards CCEA recertification. \n13 Reasons a Cost Estimate During a Concurrent Engineering Study Could Go Wrong\nAndy Braukhane\nWebinar Presentation: Wednesday June 3\, 2020 at 12:00pm EST RSVP Online \nDuring early phase spacecraft design\, the concurrent engineering (CE) approach is proven to be very efficient. But the condensed and iterative nature of CE sessions can also make life hard for a cost estimator. This work discusses 13 problem areas experienced or observed mainly during one-week\, inter-disciplinary space system design studies and provides practical examples on how to tackle them\, e.g. how to handle rapid data changes\, wrong expectations and a diverse engineering team.
URL:https://www.iceaaonline.com/calendar/processes-best-practices-category-winner-presentation/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://www.iceaaonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/CCEA-logo-060320.png
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR